Stress and Repetitive Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma Patients

Kok Leong Tan, Lai Chan Fhun, Maizan Yaakub, Mei Fong Chong, Liza Sharmini Ahmad Tajudin

Abstract


 

Glaucoma is a chronic disease that could affect the quality of life and is a potential stressor for patients. Visual field assessment is important in monitoring disease progression among glaucoma patients. Stress could influence the performance of patients in visual field test that may affect the reliability of the test. Our objective in this study was to determine the association between stress score using Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) questionnaire and reliability indices of Humphrey visual field analysis (HFA). A total of 155 primary and secondary glaucoma patients were recruited in the study. Face to face interview using stress component of DASS questionnaire was conducted after automated HFA test. Reliability indices; i.e. fixation loss, false positive, and false negative error, were used to determine the accuracy of HFA result. Only 12 patients (7.7%) were found to have elevated stress score. No significant correlation was found between DASS stress score and the reliability indices of HFA. There was 0.2 folds (95% confidence interval (CI) [-2.35, -0.06], p = 0.039) reduction of fixation loss for every number of HFA done. For every one year increase in age, there was 0.2 folds (95% CI [-0.38, -0.07], p = 0.006) reduction in false positive error in HFA. Minimal stress may not affect the reliability of HFA assessment. Minimising stress among glaucoma patients is important not only for assessment of visual field but also for improvement of quality of life.




Keywords


Glaucoma, reliability, stress, visual field.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):pp.1685-1687.

Cohen S, Tyrrell DA, Smith AP. Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(9):pp.606-612

Lupien SJ, Maheu F, Tu M, Fiocco A, Schramek TE. The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain Cogn. 2007;65(3):pp.209-237.

McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5(2):pp.205-216.

McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(18):pp.2093-2101.

Shily BG. Psychophysiological stress, elevated intraocular pressure, and acute closed-angle glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1987;64(11):pp.866-870.

Cukor D, Cohen SD, Peterson RA, Kimmel PL. Psychosocial aspects of chronic disease: ESRD as a paradigmatic illness. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(12):pp.3042-3055.

Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R, Shuttleworth EC, Dyer CS, Ogrocki P, Speicher CE. Chronic stress and immunity in family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease victims. Psychosom Med. 1987;49(5):pp.523-535.

Roder I, Boekaerts M. Stress, coping, and adjustment in children with a chronic disease: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(7):pp.311-337.

Gupta N, Weinreb RN. New definitions of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1997;8(2):pp.38-41.

Janz NK, Wren PA, Guire KE, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR. Fear of Blindness in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: Patterns and Correlates over Time. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):pp.2213-2220.

Konstas AGP, Maskaleris G, Gratsonidis S, Sardelli C. Compliance and viewpoint of glaucoma patients in Greece. Eye. 2000;14(5):pp.752-756.

Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(11):pp.1447-1455.

Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Driving cessation and driving limitation in glaucoma: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(10):pp.1846-1853.

Broadway DC. Visual field testing for glaucoma – a practical guide. Community Eye Health. 2012;25(79-80):pp.66-70.

Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Fields. Am J Ophthalmo. 1989;108(2):pp.130-135.

Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V, Hughes BA, Kim C, Lee D. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(7):pp.1126-1130.

Kramer BC, Musch DC, Niziol LM, Weizer JS. Original article: Reliability of Simultaneous Visual Field Testing. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:pp.304-307.

Schwabe L, Wolf OT. Learning under stress impairs memory formation. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010;93(2):pp.183-188.

Noble CE, Hays JR. Discrimination Reaction Performance as a Function of Anxiety and Sex Parameters. Percept Mot Skills. 1966;23(3_suppl):pp.1267-1278.

Fasih U, Hamirani MM, Jafri AR, Riaz SU, Shaikh A. Assessment of anxiety and depression in primary open angle glaucoma patients (a study of 100 cases). Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;26(3):pp.143-147.

Parkitny L, McAuley J. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). J Physiother. 2010;56(3):p.204.

Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3): pp.335-343.

Contreras-Vidal JL, Teulings H, Stelmach G. Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control. Acta Psychol. 1998;100(1):pp.25-35.

Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:p.51.

Lipner M. Glaucoma patient on alert: comorbid control. Eye World. 2008.

U'Ren RC, Riddle MC, Lezak MD, Bennington‐Davis M. The mental efficiency of the elderly person with type II diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38(5):pp.505-510.

Erb C, Batra A, Lietz A, Bayer AU, Flammer J, Thiel H-J. Psychological characteristics of patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237(9):pp.753-757.

Brody S, Erb C, Veit R, Rau H. Intraocular pressure changes: the influence of psychological stress and the Valsalva maneuver. Biol Psychol. 1999;51(1):pp.43-57.

Kaluza G, Maurer H. Stress and intraocular pressure in open angle glaucoma. Psychol Health. 1997;12(5):pp.667-675.

Parikh RS, Parikh SR. Alternative therapy in glaucoma management: Is there any role? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(Suppl1): pp.S158-S160.

Fazio DT, Bateman JB, Christensen RE. Acute angle-closure glaucoma associated with surgical anesthesia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(3):pp.360-362.

Kirsch RE. A study of provocative tests for angle closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74(6):pp.770-776.

Lowe RF. Primary angle-closure glaucoma. Inheritance and environment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(1):p.13.

Hölscher C. Stress impairs performance in spatial water maze learning tasks. Behav Brain Res. 1999;100(1):pp.225-235.

Jamal M. Relationship of job stress to job performance: A study of managers and blue-collar workers. Human Relations. 1985;38(5):pp.409-424.

Kanner AD, Coyne JC, Schaefer C, Lazarus RS. Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. J Behav Med. 1981;4(1):pp.1-39.

Kutzko KE, Brito CF, Wall M. Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(7):pp.2006-2013.

Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, Barlow DH. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35(1):pp.79-89.

Johnson CA, Nelson-Quigg JM. A Prospective Three-year Study of Response Properties of Normal Subjects and Patients during Automated Perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(2):pp.269-274.




Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (JBCS)



 

Flag Counter           

                     

                                              Copyright © 2016 AMDI Publisher, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Sains Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
                                            Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.